You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The desire is to avoid scenarios where individuals are subjected to server side biometric matching by RPs due to insufficient indications of what authentication occurred. This could be achieve a number of ways, but the intent is to allow for a request and response model where the RP can indicate a preference for a specific holder authentication type. The wallet will then indicate what authentication type occurred or whether the preference was met. If a wallet cannot achieve the desired authentication level the RP can then decide what to do with the information.
This was substantially informed by feedback from US financial institutions over concerns around having no visibility into how the holder is authenticating at transaction time.
This was also discussed sometime ago in DCP working group.
The issue is that this signal only gets reliable, if there is a wallet attestation, which was discussed in length in OpenID4VP and finally rejected.
So the questions to answer first in my view is: do we want wallet attestations or not?
This came up again in a presentation by the PSD2 folks at FIDO authenticate. They are expecting to see this information captured as AMR in OID4VP. Would be good to carve out some more agenda time for this discussion in the future.
Activity
paulbastian commentedon Aug 31, 2026
This was also discussed sometime ago in DCP working group.
The issue is that this signal only gets reliable, if there is a wallet attestation, which was discussed in length in OpenID4VP and finally rejected.
So the questions to answer first in my view is: do we want wallet attestations or not?
Ryang03 commentedon Oct 26, 2026
This came up again in a presentation by the PSD2 folks at FIDO authenticate. They are expecting to see this information captured as AMR in OID4VP. Would be good to carve out some more agenda time for this discussion in the future.