Repository navigation
Added condition to exit MULTI_CYCLE stage on CV-X_IF instruction - #344
Merged
Merged
Conversation
|
Thanks @anecorral, this looks good and passes our verification regression (with XInterface set to '0). This change will break equivalence, so I have deliberately not launched the workflows. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As discussed on #342.
(
cve2_id_stage.sv) Addedx_result_i.wecondition to assertcoproc_doneto exit MULTI_CYCLE stage for CV-X-IF instruction expecting writeback.