Skip to content

docs: remove timeoutMS from experimental features - #5087

Merged
tadjik1 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs-experimental-features
Oct 30, 2026
Merged

tadjik1 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs-experimental-features

Conversation

@tadjik1

@tadjik1 tadjik1 commented Oct 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Summary of Changes

Adjust table of experimental features (CSOT had been deprecated).

Double check the following

  • Lint is passing (npm run check:lint)
  • Self-review completed using the steps outlined here
  • PR title follows the correct format: type(NODE-xxxx)[!]: description
    • Example: feat(NODE-1234)!: rewriting everything in coffeescript
  • Changes are covered by tests
  • New TODOs have a related JIRA ticket

@tadjik1
tadjik1 marked this pull request as ready for review October 30, 2026 09:24
@tadjik1
tadjik1 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 30, 2026 09:24
Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings October 30, 2026 09:24

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended

No active review issues remain for the documentation-only change removing the experimental designation from timeoutMS.

No open issues 🎉

What changed in this PR

Updates the MongoDB Node.js driver documentation to stop listing client-side operation timeouts (timeoutMS) as experimental. No runtime behavior changes.

Changes:

  • Removes Timeout Management from the experimental features table.
  • Removes its detailed documentation, including cursor timeout modes and GridFS stream examples.
File Description
EXPERIMENTAL_FEATURES.md Removes the timeoutMS experimental listing and associated sections.

Review effort: Balanced

@tadjik1
tadjik1 merged commit 9c54464 into main Oct 30, 2026
10 checks passed
@tadjik1
tadjik1 deleted the docs-experimental-features branch October 30, 2026 11:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants