Skip to content

[i2c, dv] Removed the inactive thread - #31253

Merged
KinzaQamar merged 1 commit into
lowRISC:masterfrom
KinzaQamar:i2c_seq_stop
Sep 19, 2026
Merged

KinzaQamar merged 1 commit into
lowRISC:masterfrom
KinzaQamar:i2c_seq_stop

Conversation

@KinzaQamar

@KinzaQamar KinzaQamar commented Sep 7, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We'll get this wait(stop) thread activated by calling seq_stop() in i2c_base_seq which is not been done
anywhere for I2C DV.

@KinzaQamar
KinzaQamar requested a review from a team as a code owner September 7, 2026 13:50
@KinzaQamar
KinzaQamar requested review from hcallahan-lowrisc and rswarbrick and removed request for a team September 7, 2026 13:50

@rswarbrick rswarbrick left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given that the task isn't used anywhere in the repository, I think we should probably drop it and the associated variable too?

We'll get this wait(stop) thread activated by calling
seq_stop() in i2c_base_seq which is not been done
anywhere for I2C DV.

Signed-off-by: Kinza Qamar <kqzaman@lowrisc.org>

@rswarbrick rswarbrick left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm a big fan! :-D

@KinzaQamar
KinzaQamar added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 19, 2026
Merged via the queue into lowRISC:master with commit 9f12306 Sep 19, 2026
52 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants