Skip to content

Find a happy system for reweighting #10

Open

Description

@SamStudio8

Currently, reweighting works pretty well, apart from cases like this:
screenshot from 2017-02-06 12-47-45

We end up "spending" the observed GA's on the first few rounds of path finding. Leaving us only able to select the unweighted GG option in future paths. This is technically correct, but we need a method that perhaps uses more delicate reweighting?

Activity

  1. self-assigned this
    on Feb 6, 2017
  2. SamStudio8 commented on Feb 6, 2017

    @SamStudio8
    OwnerAuthor

    screenshot from 2017-02-06 13-12-43

    etc.

  3. SamStudio8 commented on Feb 6, 2017

    @SamStudio8
    OwnerAuthor

    In a quick and dirty fashion, we can cap the ratio used to reweight the Hansel matrix and this yields more accurate results (on the order of 0.2-2%). This somewhat confirms the hypothesis that aggressive reweighting is likely to be the cause of the close-but-no-cigar results on some of our datasets.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions