Repository navigation
docs: point the contract standards at the Aztec Foundation's aztec-standards repo, and fix the private FPC salt - #25769
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…tec-standards repository The aztec-standards repository under defi-wonderland is archived; the Aztec Foundation now maintains the standards at AztecProtocol/aztec-standards. - Source links name the Foundation repository: main in the dev docs, the v6.0.0 tag in the v6.0.0 snapshot, the v5.2.0 tag in the v5.2.0 snapshot. - The pages say the standards are maintained by the Aztec Foundation. - Dev docs and v6.0.0: the quoted AIP-20, AIP-721, AIP-4626 and escrow snippets are requoted from v6.0.0 (same commit as main), with the prose that described the old code. The AIP-4626 vault is now a standalone contract with a separate share token. - The standards index and the getting-started tutorial carry the repository's unaudited notice instead of recommending the standards for production; the vault page carries its not-production-ready warning; the generic proxy page says it is an internal test utility upstream.
The private-fee-juice package records its canonical deployment salt as 1 in canonical-deployment.json (enforced by registerPrivateContract's assertCanonical option), and has since package 5.0.0. The private fee juice pages said 0. The heading, its anchor and the inbound link follow, in the dev docs and the v6.0.0 and v5.2.0 snapshots. The per-deposit bridge salt is unchanged.
…on wording, no dashes in the standards lists
asterite
approved these changes
Nov 5, 2026
This was referenced Nov 5, 2026
alejoamiras
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 8, 2026
…cs checks (#25775) Fixes what the v6 release rehearsal turned up, plus a few gaps found along the way: - Outdated commands and Node.js versions in the tutorials. Each page now states the Node.js minimum the Aztec installer enforces for its version, and docs releases check it. - Two lost migration notes, restored. - An overstated claim in the recursive verification tutorial. - The awesome-aztec description in llms.txt. - Two docs checks that failed for the wrong reason. - The v6 docs line now has the contract-standards links and private fee juice salt that the main docs got in #25769. - The Immutables page warns that the macro it uses has been archived.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
AztecProtocol/aztec-standardsinstead of the archiveddefi-wonderland/aztec-standards.mainin the dev docs, thev6.0.0tag in the v6.0.0 docs, and thev5.2.0tag in the v5.2.0 docs.@aztec-foundation/aztec-standards(dev and v6.0.0 docs).aztec-standardsv6.0.0, and the text around them now matches that code.PrivateFPCdeployment salt as1, the value theprivate-fee-juicepackage records, instead of0. The per-deposit bridge salt is unchanged.