feature: Exclude archived repositories from list queries TAROT-3758

[lolgab]

Summary

• Add isArchived: false to ListOrganizationRepositoriesQuery and ListUserRepositoriesQuery to filter out archived repos from results.

Test plan

• Run query against real org/user with archived repos, confirm they're excluded.

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request attempts to filter out archived repositories by adding the isArchived: false argument to both the ListOrganizationRepositoriesQuery and ListUserRepositoriesQuery GraphQL queries. However, the repositories field on both the Organization and User types in the GitHub GraphQL schema does not support this argument, which will result in GraphQL validation errors. To resolve this, you should either fetch the isArchived field and filter the results on the client side, or use the search query with archived:false.

Important

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.

[gemini-code-assist]

The repositories field on the Organization type in the GitHub GraphQL schema does not accept an isArchived argument. Adding isArchived: false here will cause a GraphQL validation error. To filter out archived repositories, you must either fetch the isArchived field and filter them on the client side, or use the search query with archived:false.

[gemini-code-assist]

The repositories field on the User type in the GitHub GraphQL schema does not accept an isArchived argument. Adding isArchived: false here will cause a GraphQL validation error. To filter out archived repositories, you must either fetch the isArchived field and filter them on the client side, or use the search query with archived:false.

[codacy-production]

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

AI Reviewer: first review requested successfully. AI can make mistakes. Always validate suggestions.

_{TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.}

[codacy-production]

Pull Request Overview

The PR successfully implements the filtering logic to exclude archived repositories from organization and user-level GraphQL queries, aligning with the stated intent. Codacy analysis marks the PR as 'up to standards', although it notes that coverage requirements are missing for the new logic.

The primary concern is the lack of automated test coverage. Relying solely on manual verification for query logic introduces a risk of regression, especially as the repository structure or GraphQL schema evolves. It is recommended to implement automated integration tests to verify the exclusion logic before merging.

About this PR

• The PR lacks automated integration tests to verify that the GraphQL query filters correctly exclude archived repositories. Relying on manual verification is insufficient for core listing logic; please add unit or integration tests to confirm the behavior for both organization and user repository queries.

Test suggestions

• Verify ListOrganizationRepositoriesQuery excludes repositories where isArchived is true.
• Verify ListUserRepositoriesQuery excludes repositories where isArchived is true.

Prompt proposal for missing tests

Consider implementing these tests if applicable:
1. Verify ListOrganizationRepositoriesQuery excludes repositories where isArchived is true.
2. Verify ListUserRepositoriesQuery excludes repositories where isArchived is true.

_{TIP Improve review quality by adding custom instructions
TIP How was this review? Give us feedback}

[lolgab]

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/octokit/octokit.graphql.net/main/src/Octokit.GraphQL/Model/Organization.cs

isArchived exists and does what we want.