Allow users to Search ACL Rule

[btzq]

ISSUE TYPE

• Improvement Request

COMPONENT NAME

Improvement Request (UI, Functionality)

CLOUDSTACK VERSION

4.19

CONFIGURATION

N/A

OS / ENVIRONMENT

N/A

SUMMARY

Note: This ticket is broken down as requested from the origianl post, #8841

Allow users to Search ACL Rule

• In large scale projects like ours, we have around 20-40 ACL Rules.
• As the rules increase, its hard to read and identify.
• Supporting search ACL Rule would help.

STEPS TO REPRODUCE

N/A

N/A

EXPECTED RESULTS

To be able to manage ACL Rules more easily for large scale projects

ACTUAL RESULTS

Challenging to use ACL rules for large scale projects.

[DaanHoogland]

There is no generic keyword search (working!) as for other list APIs.
There is no search on the field reason.
There is no search by order/number.
There is no search by cidr.
There is no search by ....

for other fields the search is implemented, @btzq : networkId, id, traffictype, protocol, action

[DaanHoogland]

@btzq , I started looking at this one, but am a bit strugling with still. I think we can improve a bit on what the extension of functionality would be. Care to chime in?

In #9566 I am adding reason to the generic keyword search listNetworkACLs command, but that is for the lists and not for the items.

Am I correct in understanding that this is mainly a UI issue?

[btzq]

Hey @DaanHoogland , just to clarify you mean 'Lists' and 'Items' are as below, right?

If yes, then in my opinion, just being bale to search the specific List/Rule will be sufficient. Its just to make navigating the dozens of List/Rule easier by only showing me the row users wanna see.

[DaanHoogland]

I have implemented search for protocol and reason in #9566 @btzq . I think the other items are going to be more difficult but I'll think about those. Can you have a look/test?

[btzq]

Im not sure how to compile Cloudstack from source tho... What about a video? I could verify it there.

Also, i dont think its necessary to search by the Items.

Search by Protocol and Reason is enough.